Copilot
Your everyday AI companion
  1. Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC - Casetext

    • SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. Laura Zubulake is suing her former employer, UBS Warburg LLC (hereinafter "UBS"), for sex discrimination, including disparate treatment and wrongful termination, anSee more

    I. Plaintiff's Motion to Preclude Evidence of Her Prior Employment

    Plaintiff seeks to preclude defendants from using evidence of plaintiff's prior employment to … See more

    Casetext
    A. to Preclude Alleged Acts of Discrimination Against Another UBS Employee

    Defendants seek to preclude plaintiff from introducing evidence of alleged acts of discrimination directed at sales assistant Peggy Yeh by Matthew Chapin, the Manager o… See more

    Casetext
    B. to Preclude Irrelevant Testimony

    1. Court Decisions and Discovery Defendants contend that this Court's previous decisions in this case, including the imposition of sanctions on UBS, are irrelevant t… See more

    Casetext
    Back-Up Tapes

    Defendants seek to preclude any evidence concerning the failure by UBS to preserve several monthly back-up tapes. In Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC, 220 F.R.D. 212, (S.D.N.Y. 2… See more

    Casetext
    Securities Exchange Commission Compliance

    According to defendants, any testimony about UBS's compliance with Securities Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 17a-4 is irrelevant and should be excluded. Defendant… See more

    Casetext
    Chapin's Arrest

    Defendants also seek to prevent plaintiff from introducing testimony and documents concerning Chapin's arrest for disorderly conduct which occurred during a client outing with … See more

    Casetext
    feedback
  1. Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC | Case Brief for Law Students

  2. People also ask
    Zubulake v. UBS Warburg Zubulake v. UBS Warburg Zubulake v. UBS Warburg is a case heard between 2003 and 2005 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Judge Shira Scheindlin, presiding over the case, issued a series of groundbreaking opinions in the field of electronic discovery.
    Those of us who have been involved in litigation support and discovery management for years are fully aware of the significance of the Zubulake case and its huge impact on discovery of electronic data. Even if you haven’t been in the industry for several years, you’ve probably heard of the case and understand that it’s a significant case.
    In addition, Laura Zubulake sought an adverse inference instruction against UBS and the costs for re-deposing some individuals due to the destruction of evidence. The court found that the defendant had a duty to preserve evidence since it should have known that it would be relevant for future litigation.
    For those who aren’t aware, let’s take a look back. The plaintiff, Laura Zubulake, filed suit against her former employer UBS Warburg, alleging gender discrimination, failure to promote, and retaliation.
  3. Zubulake V: Court Grants Adverse Inference Instruction and …

  4. ZUBULAKE v. UBS WARBURG LLC | S.D. New York | 07-20-2004

  5. Web16 Mar 2012 · UBS Warburg, 2004 WL 1620866 (S.D.N.Y. July 20, 2004) (Zubulake V) In July 2004, Judge Scheindlin ruled that UBS had failed to take all necessary steps to guarantee that relevant data was both …

  6. Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC | Legal Documents | H2O

  7. Some results have been removed